Wednesday, July 18, 2012

My Vision for the Next 100 Years on Earth


This article will discuss future woes that will inevitably become a reality in our society. The supporting evidence that I will use in this article will be strong and respectable scientific evidence.  Believe me when I tell you that I am not alone about the thoughts that I will bring forth. As they say, history tends to repeat itself. Scholars and I believe that what you are about to read, may very well happen. It is not a matter of if, but rather a matter of when.

The world is changing, there is no doubt about it. The United States, the most influential nation in the world, is once again at the forefront of the current changes and will be leading (along with other powerhouse nations such as China and Russia) the future changes. Over the last 200 years, the human race has gone from what some would call prehistoric, due to the unimaginable lack of technology, to an "advanced race".  We travelled to the moon, planes practically fly themselves, technology is advancing each day, and there are 7 billion people and counting. But everything hasn't always been so peachy sounding, nor will it in the future. Those alive today, along with future generations, face a dark and dismal future filled with war, famine, disease and a potential economic collapse due to corruption and globalization of monopolistic corporations.

One of the worst dilemmas that the world faces today is the energy need of the future.  Scientists at Oxford speculate that we will deplete global oil supplies in about 40 years (2052), give or take, at our current rate of extraction and consumption (OPEC).  In addition to that statistic, Oxford also estimates that oil demand will exceed oil supply, globally, in 2015.  It is sad to see that Governor Romney and his billionaire oil-tycoon energy advisor, Harold Hamm, are pushing for increased use and production of U.S. Made oil.  This action, if pursued by Romney, given he wins the presidential election in November, will put the United States and the world in a position that may increase global consumption and production of oil bringing the 2052 point much sooner.  It is time to start deviating from the tradition methods of creating energy for the world; with our backs up against the wall, and only 3 years or so until demand exceeds supply, we have no time to waste…we must start heavily investing in alternative energy sources. 

Getting back on track, after 2050, when all oil deposits are depleted of their resources, I speculate that the United States, and most of the world, will only start to begin the process of mass producing alternative energy sources to supply our nation and world with energy.  As we have seen in the past, society tends to wait until it is too late to act on whatever the problem is; in this case it is energy.  With information such as that presented by Oxford, we have yet to see a major push for alternative energy in the Untied States, or the world, that would indicate a societal and governmental change in the way that we view obtaining energy. 

As we have seen in the last two decades, whether some want to believe it or not, there have been global wars for natural resources, namely oil.  The United States has created a significant presence in the Middle East starting with President George H. W. Bush and continuing until today.  I see this as a tactical move for the future.  Within the next 50 years, as oil supplies approach depletion, the United States will be in the perfect position to acquire the worlds largest oil deposit.  With thousands of troops in the region, and the thousands more that will mostly likely be deployed there over the years, we will have a military presence capable of defending the natural resources available.  As stated in the beginning of this article, I mentioned that there will be wars fought over resources; the Oil War, as I like to think of it, will be the first of their kind.  It will not be the United States against the nations that make up the Middle East, no.  This will be a global war comprising of two groups, the United States and its allies (most likely the EU nations, NATO nations, etc) versus Russia and its known allies, and the soon to be allies of Russia.  The end result will be the war ending when the oil is gone.  If ended prior to that point, there will be one side who will have the oil and the remaining countries will become oil-less. 

Oil always has, and always will be (until it is gone) the driving force of the global economy.  No nation on Earth can currently sustain itself without oil.  I believe there will be select countries that will realize the severity of the situation and act in a way that will set them up to succeed and survive the issues ahead of us.  Already, nations in Scandinavia, Europe and Asia are taking the necessary steps and starting the transition towards a sustainable alternative energy fueled nation.  Most of the residencies in states such as Sweden, Iceland, Norway and Finland are heated by means of geo-thermal energy, using the Earth’s emitted heat to warm their water and houses.  The Netherlands is using tidal power and wind power to fuel much of their country.  China is investing billions of dollars a year to fund the research and development of solar panels as they try and strive away from one of their current major sources of power, coal.  But what do we see in America, no action and only the criticism of those who are trying to lobby for this action.  The first attempt by President Obama to follow in China’s footsteps by subsidizing the solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, ended in the company ultimately filing for bankruptcy.  This should in no way discourage Congress or the public from progressing in this direction.  Success cannot come without failure.  One way or another, we will have to make the transition to a total alternative energy driven nation.  This WILL happen within the next 100 years. 

The location and resources available in our nation are immense; we have thousands of miles of coastline that can be used for tidal and wind energy, millions of acres of open land in the mid-west for solar energy and the entire country has the ability to support geothermal energy.  In addition to this, the United States has arguably the best and most advanced technology to support new nuclear power plants, which can essentially replace oil as the largest supplier of energy.  Unfortunately, nuclear energy may be a non-renewable resource itself, as we do not know how much uranium is available on Earth.  Our nation has the ability to successfully invest in every type of alternative energy to power our nation, our houses, our cars and every other energy-requiring object.  The first steps are always the hardest, but we must take them. 

In accordance with the energy need of the future and our current way of acquiring energy (through the use of fossil fuels), climate change will eventually reach a tipping point and the consequences will be devastating.  Currently, carbon dioxide is the target emission that governments around the world are trying to reduce and eliminate in an effort to combat and possibly reverse the current state of climate change.  Scientists dispute the “tipping point” at which we will see irreversible changes to our environment and climates.  Some say that 450ppm (ppm, or parts per million, being the measurement at which carbon is measured in the atmosphere) is the maximum amount of carbon before all Hell breaks loose.  Others, such as 350.org, are suggesting that 350ppm was the tipping point.  We are now hovering above 395ppm, according to, co2now.org.  Regardless of what the tipping point is, scientists have no way of determining what it might be and what the consequences will be once we reach it.  Whether or not we passed it or are rapidly closing in on it, the climate is changing and with each year that passes, we are noticing more extreme weather and are recording startling levels in sea-level rise, global temperature and their effects on the Earth and society. 

Since the Industrial Revolution, mankind, due to the burning of coal and fossil fuels, has risen carbon dioxide levels more than 100 ppm.  The last time that carbon levels were this high was more than 15 million years ago (Wolpert).  So in essence, in 200 years, we have been able to raise carbon levels in ways that it took the natural world millions of years to do – round of applause to mankind!  It is a known and accepted fact among scientists that carbon dioxide in a greenhouse gas.  A greenhouse gas is a gas that has the ability to trap heat transmitted from the sun and reflected off of the Earth’s surface in the atmosphere.  A major argument among Global Warming non-believers is whether or not carbon dioxide causes global warming.  While it is not the only contributor, carbon is one of the largest, especially today at the rate it is being emitted into the atmosphere.  Just like oxygen and water, carbon has the ability to retain heat at higher levels than oxygen, and methane is 20 times better at retaining heat than carbon ("Methane…”).  So the ability of carbon to retain heat is real and it is happening.  With more carbon added into the atmosphere (carbon levels are rising at an average of 2ppm per year) more heat in being trapped in the atmosphere causing average global temperatures to increase – the Greenhouse Effect.  Unfortunately, due to the rise in global temperature, scientists believe this is the direct cause of the extreme weather and rise in sea level seen over the past 100 or so years. 

At current rates, we will surpass the “tipping point” of 450 ppm years before the estimated oil depletion year.  In the future, due to extreme carbon dioxide levels, the earth is supposed to warm up anywhere from 3-7 degrees Fahrenheit over the next 50-100 years (Blaine).  Whether it is 3 or 7 degrees, or somewhere in between, a one-degree increase over the last 100 years ("Future Climate Change…”) has caused mass glacial melting, which in turn has caused sea levels to rise 4-10 inches – varying due to location – ("Climate Change Over…”).  In addition to sea level rise, the amount and magnitude of weather anomalies’ has drastically increased; we have seen stronger tropical storms more frequently, which have taken countless lives and cost hundreds of billions of dollars in damage.  If the estimated increase in global temperature happens (some sort of increase will happen), we can expect to see a partial, to total melting of the Antarctic, Greenland and other glacial caps.  On July 18, 2012, the Huffington Post reported that the Petermann Ice Cap in Greenland broke off into the ocean.  This piece of ice is double the size of Manhattan (Borenstein); this is yet another example of ice cap depletion which may have consequences on humans around the world.  If we were to lose both of these ice caps, global sea level is estimated to rise two feet globally, which will essentially put many island nations, such as the Maldives in the Indian Ocean, under water, displacing millions of people from their homes and forcing them to relocate elsewhere in the world.  Aside from that threat, here in the U.S., New Orleans will no longer be inhabitable; much of Florida and Manhattan will also be under water.  Simply put, maps will have to be redone and the face of the Earth will be forever changed.  What are now the beaches of the United States will be underwater and those who lived miles from the ocean may have beachfront real estate.  With 44% of the worlds population (or 3 billion people) living within 150km of the ocean ("UN Atlas…”), by the end of the century, we may see close to 1 billion environmental refugees due to sea level rise.  That means 1 billion, or more, people whose home are underwater and have nowhere to go.  Many of these people will most likely relocate to urban centers inland as the coastal metropolises will be uninhabitable.  The most populated area in the world that will be effected by this the most is South East Asia, specifically China and India.  Just over 1/3 of the world’s population lives in these two nations (Exner) with most living in cities such as Shanghai, Hong Kong, Beijing, Calcutta, Mumbai and Kochi – all of which are cities only a few miles from the ocean. 

So far, the future isn’t looking so bright.

Global Warming is directly related to, but not the only cause of, Climate Change.  Many believe these two terms to be the same, when they are in fact very much different.  The process of global warming affects the systems that make up climate change.  One of the better-known examples is the melting of the ice caps, which releases freshwater into the oceans.  Our oceans are driven by a system called thermo-haline circulation, which is a mixture of salinity (saltiness) and the temperature of the water – an example: Hot water rises, cold water sink and saltier (denser) water sinks and less salty (less dense) water rises.  This system creates our oceans currents and creates the atmospheric climates that define our world.  With the addition of freshwater, salinity is directly affected which throws off ocean currents, the main driver of global climate.  Over the past decade, we have seen extreme weather differentials in the U.S. and all over the world.  Summers tend to be getting warmer, winters are mostly getting colder, droughts are becoming more prevalent and extreme and what were once temperate climates (The Mid Atlantic Area and North) and are becoming more like tropical regions for longer amounts of time out of the year. 

Over the past few months, as a result of drought and climate change, thousands of towns across the country have broke temperature records, and we are currently experiencing one of the worst, if not the worst drought in our history.  “The U.S. Department of Agriculture has recently named over 1000 counties in 26 states as disaster areas – the largest declaration in history – as a result of the recent drought, wildfires and other extreme weather events” as former Vice President, Al Gore, put it on his website (Gore).  These types of phenomenon are not being seen in the United States alone; extreme weather has affected almost every region of the world in the past five years, and it is only getting worse.  According to the University College of London, almost all of the Northern Hemisphere is experiencing extreme droughts that have drastic consequences on the local regions (University).  Fresh water resources in Asia and Africa have evaporated leaving millions of people with little freshwater, people are starving because their crops and livestock are dying and the shear heat that is overcoming these nations is hot enough to kill. 


As stated earlier, climate change is partly occurring as a result of a disruption in the thermo-haline circulation system.  Over the next 100 years, with the Earth’s global temperature set to raise more anywhere from 3-7 degrees, with the most extreme temperature increases occurring in the polar regions, we can expect to see a total melting of glacial ice releasing billions of gallons of freshwater into the oceans which will not only raise sea level drastically, but it can possibly shut down the system that drives our global climate.  Now this shutting down of the thermo-haline circulation system will most likely not occur immediately, but with most or all of the glacial water in the oceans, it will only be a matter of time before we start seeing drastic global climate change.  The changes that we will inevitably face will force all of humanity to adapt to the new ways of life that will come as a result of climate change.


 This is a figure of the average temperature increases until the end of the century. The rows (left to right) go from the year 2011-2100.  Row 1 (Top) represents the best case scenario, Row 2 (Middle) Represents the expected increase and Row 3 (Bottom) represents the worst case scenario.  

With oil, global warming and climate change all serious threats, arguably the most severe issue that humans face in the next 100 years, is the decreasing access to freshwater.  Water is essential for all life - humans, animals and vegetation.  Without water, life as we know it would most likely not exist on this planet.  Although over 70% of the world’s surface is covered in water, less that 3% of it is fresh water.  According to National Geographic, of all of the freshwater that is on Earth, only .007% of it is accessible and drinkable for the 7 billion people living on Earth ("Clean Water Crisis...”). 

The most essential element of life is also one of the hardest to access, which will become a larger and more serious issue in the next 100 years, as our population is most likely going to exponentially grow.  Our population is expected to grow to 10 billion or more people by the end of the century ("Global population …”).  This issue directly affects the current and future global water issue as well as the ensuing food crisis that many nations around the world are already facing.  There is already famine killing millions of people each year; with a drastic population increase within the next 100 years, our already unstable food supply will undergo growing pressure to feed more people than it is capable of.  With only 7 billion people on the Earth at the moment, more and more forests and farmland are already getting destroyed in order to support the ever-growing population.  Within the next 100 years, we may no longer see the our planet from space as a blue and green, but more or less a blue and brown planet with lights covering every corner of the Earth.  With this being said, we will see the second and third natural resources wars, the Water War and the Food War. 

The issue at hand, that will ultimately decide the future of mankind is not the state of the economy, or who is the strongest nation, no.  The issue that is constantly under minded and ignored, but is the most threatening to our species is the status and stability of the environment and ecosystem.  My vision is in no way exaggerated or dramatic, it is actually supported by many of the worlds leading scientists and politicians.  Unfortunately, the issues of global warming, climate change and overpopulation draw harsh criticism from people who are fed false information.  Hundreds of billions of dollars per year are spent on advertising to brainwashing information in an attempt to persuade the public that global warming is a hoax, or that climate change is not real, or that our future is looking peachy and that everyone will have food (or only Americans considering it is mostly American corporations that monopolize the global food industry) so that the value of their company does not decrease and so their annual profit reports continue to break records.  The fact that our own politicians, the ones that we elect and who swear under oath to protect and serve the civilians of the nation and who are the same ones protecting these companies and special interest groups, should make you cringe. 

Those who realize this corruption that we call Congress and the natural resources industry are often labeled as “green freaks” or “eco freaks” because of the opposition that they show towards these corporations and people who are single handedly destroying our world now, and the future that our children will live in.  I fear for those who will be alive in the next 100 years.  It will in no way be a world that I would want to live in.  It will be a world filled with war, not because of political differences, but in an effort to survive.  Natural resources, water and food are already scarce, but will only become less available.  Global warming will raise sea level in ways that will flood most of the metropolitan areas of the world forcing billions of people to become environmental refugees.  In addition to the billions who will become refugees, there may be billions of people who will lose their lives due to global epidemics that will rapidly spread, lack of clean water for drinking and hygiene and the fact that a majority of the world population will no longer be able to eat. 

With the exception of the worlds richest nations (America, China and a few European countries) what was just said will affect the rest of the nations.  What are now our allies will become our enemies as we fight to acquire the remaining natural resources such as oil, water and food. 

I, along with millions of people, have been laughed at for caring about the environment.  Unfortunately, most nations outside of the United States do care about the environment and make it a government responsibility to ensure the environment recovers and stays in a stable state.  We have had to make sacrifices for the health of humanity and the environment before in the cases of chlorofluorocarbons (or CFC’s; a chemical used in aerosols that was a factor in the deterioration of the ozone layer) and lead.  Within a few years, most of the global community rid of the use of all CFC’s and lead in paints and fuel; not too long after that, we saw a recovery of the ozone layer and a decrease in lead concentrations in the atmosphere, as well as lead-attributed illnesses.  There is no reason that this same philosophy could not be applied in the carbon dioxide and fossil fuel issue.  Actually, there is – the Oil industry and those who protect it.  Unless we make a change to the way our governments protect and view the oil industry and start to heavily regulate carbon dioxide levels and fossil fuel use, and start to transition to renewable energy, my vision of the future can and will happen.  The United States is the strongest and most influential nation in the world, but with the political polarization that we have in our nation, it will take a drastic change and restructuring of our government and the views of a certain political party (including its public constituency) to realize that we must change our ways. 

For those who believe that environmentalism is a joke and that climate change or global warming are not real, or that humans are in no way contributing to global warming, wake up.  You are the same people that will utterly destroy our planet.  Science has proven that the combustion of fossil fuels release carbon dioxide.  Science has proven that carbon dioxide traps heat and finally, science has proven that the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere traps heat from the sun causing global temperature to rise.  Global warming and climate change are very real and are occurring right in front of our eyes. 

For those who do not believe that a stable and healthy environment create a stable and health economy, also need to wake up.  We have seen that natural disasters such as tropical cyclones, mudslides and tornadoes’, as well as other natural disaster, have not only caused millions of lives throughout history, but it has also caused national and global economies to plummet - Hurricane Katrina did it in 2005.  With an unstable and climate change-prone environment, strong tropical storms, heavy rains, droughts and more natural phenomena will continue to occur.  Without healthy crops and livestock, our market prices will skyrocket, as we are seeing now with the drought that is sweeping the United States. 

Some have forgotten that the fossil fuels debate is just as much of an environmental issue, as it is an economic issue, if not more.  It was the natural world that developed the fuel that we use every day.  Without the millions of years that it took to create the oil, coal and natural gas, there would be no fossil fuels here.  We only started heavily using these resources less than 200 years ago at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and it will have only taken 300 years to deplete the oil deposits, and possibly the natural gas deposits as well. 

I believe that this future will happen, although I believe it is possibly preventable.  It will take drastic changes to global government priorities and it will most definitely upset many people who have special interests in certain industries.  There is no longer time for political debates on issues such as carbon emissions and global warming because the science is there and for the most part it is universally accepted.  To prevent the apocalyptic possibilities that may very well become the reality of our future, we must significantly decrease carbon emissions, ultimately eliminating them within the next few years.  Oil extraction and use must eventually stop within the next few years, as oil combustion is the leading carbon emitting source caused by man.  All developed nations, since they are the ones that use the majority of carbon emitting fuels, must start the permanent transition to renewable energies, such as nuclear energy, solar energy, hydro-electric energy, wind energy, etc.  And finally, the technology to sequester carbon from the atmosphere must be used.  While this may not completely reverse the unimaginable damage that humans have already caused to the environment, it may possibly slow down climate change systems. 

The inevitable fact that population increases will occur is another issue.  I unfortunately believe that more countries will adopt the same policies that China has on how many children a family may have in an attempt to control global populations.  With population growing as fast as it is, this may be the only temporary solution for the next 100 years until another there is better technology to care for and feed the billions of people that are expected to inhabit the Earth by the end of the century. 

This is our only home; we know of no other places in our universe that we can get to which can support our way of life.  So this is what we have.  We need to realize that the Earth was here billions of years before us and it will be here billions of years after us.  99% of all species that have lived on Earth have become extinct; with the current path that we are on, we may very well join that statistic.  We are a part of nature, as is every other living thing on this planet.  We abuse the resources that the Earth produces for us to live off of and show it no respect back.  I hope for the sake of our lives, our children’s lives, and for the future generations, that we change the way we currently live life and treat our environment.  To leave a dead and unstable environment as our legacy is not something that I want to be remembered for, and you shouldn’t either.  Again, everything that I said is not bogus material, it is scientific facts that will happen.  I do not want to live in a world consisting of global wars, billions dead and environmental disasters because we are too stubborn to stop emitting increasing levels of carbon and cutting use of fossil fuels. 

This is my letter to you all, to warn you about the future world that you and your future generations will live in if we do not change our current ways.  It is bleak, grim and disturbing.  I fear for us all, for our lives, for humanity and for all life on Earth that there may no longer be life past the end of the century.  But, if we change our ways of life, and follow the steps that I discussed, we may still have time to halt our damage and begin to reverse that damage that we have done.  It is up to us to decide our own future…what will you do? 


Works Cited:

Blaine, Thomas. "Global Climate Change, CDFS-186-96." Ohioline. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0186.html>.
Borenstein, Seth. "Petermann Glacier In Greenland Breaks Off Iceberg Twice The Size Of Manhattan." Huffington Post. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/18/greenlands-petermann-glacier-iceberg_n_1682463.html>.
"CO2 Now | CO2 Home." CO2 Now | CO2 Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://co2now.org/>.
"CO2 and Heat-Trapping Gases FAQ | Union of Concerned Scientists." UCS: Independent Science, Practical Solutions | Union of Concerned Scientists. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/CO2-and-global-warming-faq.html>.
"Clean Water Crisis, Water Crisis Facts, Water Crisis Resources - National Geographic." National Geographic. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/freshwater/freshwater-crisis/>.
"Climate Change Over the Last 100 Years." Welcome To The White House. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://clinton5.nara.gov/Initiatives/Climate/last100.html>.
Exner, Rich. "36 percent of world's population lives in China and India: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com." Cleveland OH Local News, Breaking News, Sports & Weather - cleveland.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://www.cleveland.com/datacentral/index.ssf/2011/07/36_percent_of_worlds_populatio.html>.
"Future Climate Change | Climate Change | US EPA." US Environmental Protection Agency. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://epa.gov/climatechange/science/future.html#sealevel>.
Gore, Al . "Al's Journal." Al's Journal. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://blog.algore.com/>.
"Global population to pass 10 billion by 2100, UN projections indicate." Welcome to the United Nations: It's Your World. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=38253>.
"Methane | Climate Change | U.S. EPA." US Environmental Protection Agency. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://www.epa.gov/methane/>.
OPEC. "OPEC." World Oil Outlook 2011. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 June 2012.
<www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/WOO_201
"UN Atlas: 44 percent of us live in coastal areas « Coastal Challenges . com." Coastal Challenges . com. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://coastalchallenges.com/2010/01/31/un-atlas-60-of-us-live-in-the-coastal-areas/>.
University College London. "Drought Monitor." Global Drought Monitor. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://drought.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/drought.html?map=%2Fwww%2Fdrought%2Fweb_pages%2Fdrought.map&program=%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmapserv&root=%2Fwww%2Fdrought2%2F&map_web_imagepath=%2Ftmp%2F&map_web_imageurl=%2Ftmp%2F&map_web_template=%2Fdrought.html>.
Wolpert, Stuart. "Last time carbon dioxide levels were this high: 15 million years ago,
scientists report / UCLA Newsroom." UCLA Newsroom. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 July 2012. <http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/last-time-carbon-dioxide-levels-111074.aspx>.



2 comments:

  1. i understand now shut tf up

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're a piece of shit. You're probably too stupid to even know why you're a piece of shit. You don't go to a person's blog and tell them to shut up. You must have missed the whole purpose of a blog.

      Delete